CSR Tossed Aside As Biodiversity Under Siege
Editor’s Note: If the palm oil industry wants to be sustainable, it needs to make the Sumatran tiger and orangutans the certificate of approval. We only have about 300 Sumatran tigers left alive in the wild today. Indonesia has already lost the sub-species that once roamed the islands of Bali and Java. These critically endangered species cannot afford to lose another inch of habitat and we can’t afford to lose another one of these valuable members of the ecosystem. Any industry that pushes these animals toward extinction, while claiming “sustainability” is criminal, not responsible. ConAgra’s commitment to sustainable palm oil sources in the future sounds warm and fuzzy. Unfortunately, at the current rate of destruction, Sumatra, Borneo and other critical places will be reduced to palm oil plantations and parking lots by then. Once the biodiversity is gone, sustainability claims will be an even bigger joke.
The popularity of palm oil in consumer products has prompted widespread deforestation and a jump in greenhouse gas emissions. It’s also pushing endangered species closer to extinction, while stalling on critical steps immediately.
American foods company ConAgra announced this month that by December 2015 it will only source palm oil that can be traced back to “suppliers independently verified as not developing on high carbon stock or high conservation value forests, peatlands, or engaged in human rights abuses.” This, the company says, means it will be “sourcing 100 percent sustainable palm oil.”
The palm oil commodity has become a “perfect storm of risk” to a company’s brand and to shareholder value, says Lucia von Reusner, shareholder advocate at Green Century Capital Management. Public awareness of the issues associated with its production – rainforest destruction, climate change, biodiversity loss and human rights violations – have led to commitments from the likes of Starbucks, Kelloggs, Wilmar and most recently ConAgra Foods.
The rampant deforestation for palm oil development has captured public attention, creating real reputation risks for companies that use the ingredient in their branded products, says von Reusner. Palm oil production is a leading driver of deforestation – the cause of 20 percent of greenhouse gas emissions. Despite this, production has quadrupled in the past decade and the oil is now the most widely used in the world. Added to a long list of products, palm oil is in everything from baked goods to cosmetics, and production is predicted to double by 2020.
Companies are taking note of this and with a little encouragement from shareholders, they are establishing commitments that are now going beyond standards set by the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO), of which ConAgra is a member.
In the wake of this trend, concerns have been raised as to how effective these commitments will be in actively preventing deforestation, particularly due to the ready availability of the RSPO’s ‘GreenPalm credits’. Companies can buy the credits, which are supposed to offset the use of ‘unsustainable’ palm oil in their products. The purchasing of these credits offer support to growers of sustainable palm oil, but some say this doesn’t equate to a sustainable palm oil industry.
“The biggest concern we saw was that most companies were relying on GreenPalm offsets rather than actually directing the practices of their suppliers and mitigating the physical deforestation of their supply chain,” says von Reusner.
Some investors argue that it is not possible to offset deforestation and that purchasing these credits without cleaning up the supply chain and supplier practices means that companies are not protecting their brands or shareholder value. Equally, traceability is a particular challenge for even the largest of companies. ConAgra says “clearly there is work to do across sectors to better demonstrate traceability and we recognize that the industry needs to move beyond GreenPalm certificates to make progress, and our new policy reflects our interest in having a seat at the table.”
ConAgra intends to discuss its new policy in greater detail in its 2014 Citizenship Report which will be available next month. Though only time will tell whether these policies work, they are generally received as a “step in the right direction”, says George Mason University professor Thomas Lovejoy, who brought attention to deforestation in the 1970s. “The interest on the part of some industry is genuine, I believe” Mason says. “But the difficulty often comes down to the details. As these issues begin to gain traction, you then begin to see response on the part of the less responsible suppliers. And their first reaction is usually to find a way around it and go to a company that does not have such a policy”.
Lovejoy says this can be countered through social pressure, which prompts other companies to join in the exercise and “that’s when you make real progress”. Soon there will be an acute awareness, says Lovejoy, of the importance of forests in addressing climate change and the global carbon cycle.
Agreeing, von Reusner says that although these commitments are ambitious, if they are fully implemented they have the ability to transform the palm oil industry and prevent any further deforestation. Although commitments from major companies such as ConAgra will have a significant impact, the main driver, she says, is coming from Wilmar, who controls 45% of global palm oil trade. Von Reusner says that Wilmar’s commitment, announced in December 2013, has prompted more suppliers, like Golden Agri Resources and Cargill, to improve their palm oil sourcing. This has resulted in close to 60% of the palm oil supply chain being covered by the company’s No Deforestation, No Peat, No Exploitation Policy. (No mention of endangered species?)
Another important element is scrutiny from NGOs, investors and the public, which is likely to help ensure these commitments are upheld. “We’re entering a new age of expectation around transparency in the supply chain,” says von Reusner. “For the first time investors are really pushing and expecting companies to deliver full traceability down to the plantation level.”